Books > Business & Economics > Industry & industrial studies > Industrial relations & safety > Occupational / industrial health & safety
|
Buy Now
Recommendations for a New Rock Dusting Standard to Prevent Coal Dust Explosions in Intake Airways (Paperback)
Loot Price: R382
Discovery Miles 3 820
|
|
Recommendations for a New Rock Dusting Standard to Prevent Coal Dust Explosions in Intake Airways (Paperback)
(sign in to rate)
Loot Price R382
Discovery Miles 3 820
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
The workings of a bituminous coal mine produce explosive coal dust
for which adding rock dust can reduce the potential for explosions.
Accordingly, guidelines have been established by the Mine Safety
and Health Administration (MSHA) about the relative proportion of
rock dust that must be present in a mine's intake and return
airways. Current MSHA regulations require that intake airways
contain at least 65% incombustible content and return airways
contain at least 80% incombustible content. The higher limit for
return airways was set in large part because finer coal dust tends
to collect in these airways. Based on extensive in-mine coal dust
particle size surveys and large-scale explosion tests, the National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) recommends a
new standard of 80% total incombustible content (TIC) be required
in the intake airways of bituminous coal mines in the absence of
methane. MSHA inspectors routinely monitor rock dust inerting
efforts by collecting dust samples and measuring the percentage of
TIC, which includes measurements of the moisture in the samples,
the ash in the coal, and the rock dust. These regulations were
based on two important findings: a survey of coal dust particle
size that was performed in the 1920s, and large-scale explosion
tests conducted in the U.S. Bureau of Mines' Bruceton Experimental
Mine (BEM) using dust particles of that survey's size range to
determine the amount of inerting material required to prevent
explosion propagation. Mining technology and practices have changed
considerably since the 1920s, when the original coal dust particle
survey was performed. Also, it has been conclusively shown that as
the size of coal dust particles decreases, the explosion hazard
increases. Given these factors, NIOSH and MSHA conducted a joint
survey to determine the range of coal particle sizes found in dust
samples collected from intake and return airways of U.S. coal
mines. Results from this survey show that the coal dust found in
mines today is much finer than in mines of the 1920s. This increase
in fine dust is presumably due to the increase in mechanization. In
light of this recent comprehensive dust survey, NIOSH conducted
additional large-scale explosion tests at the Lake Lynn
Experimental Mine (LLEM) to determine the degree of rock dusting
necessary to abate explosions. The tests used Pittsburgh seam coal
dust blended as 38% minus 200 mesh and referred to as medium-sized
dust. This medium-sized blend was used to represent the average of
the finest coal particle size collected from the recent dust
survey. Explosion tests indicate that medium-sized coal dust
required 76.4% TIC to prevent explosion propagation. Even the
coarse coal dust (20% minus 200 mesh or 75 m), representative of
samples obtained from mines in the 1920s, r equired approximately
70% TIC to be rendered inert in the larger LLEM, a level higher
than the current regulation of 65% TIC. Given the results of the
extensive in-mine coal dust particle size surveys and large-scale
explosion tests, NIOSH recommends a new standard of 80% TIC be
required in the intake airways of bituminous coal mines in the
absence of methane. The survey results indicate that in some cases
there are no substantial differences between the coal dust particle
size distributions in return and intake air courses in today's coal
mines. The survey results indicate that the current requirement of
80% TIC in return airways is still appropriate in the absence of
background methane.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.