What is the effect of deliberation on political actors and when can
we expect it to be successful? Are mutual understanding and
consensus realistic results of political decision-making processes
or is compromise the most we can hope for? This book addresses what
appear to be blind spots in theories of deliberative democracy: the
conceptual and empirical relationship between communication and
political preferences and the institutional preconditions for
preference change and co-ordination. It proposes a model of
preference transformation through communication and develops a
typology of modes of political interaction that distinguishes
discussion, deliberation, debate and bargaining. This serves as a
framework for the analysis of a fundamental and highly polarising
conflict - the German decision over the import of embryonic stem
cells. Analysis of communicative interaction in different forums
shows how a well justified and widely accepted compromise was
achieved in a conflict that had appeared irresolvable in moral
terms and irreducible in terms of interest.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!