All academic disciplines periodically appraise their
effectiveness, evaluating the progress of previous scholarship and
judging which approaches are useful and which are not. Although no
field could survive if it did nothing but appraise its progress,
occasional appraisals are important and if done well can help
advance the field.This book investigates how international
relations theorists can better equip themselves to determine the
state of scholarly work in their field. It takes as its starting
point Imre Lakatos's influential theory of scientific change, and
in particular his methodology of scientific research programs
(MSRP). It uses MSRP to organize its analysis of major research
programs over the last several decades and uses MSRP's criteria for
theoretical progress to evaluate these programs. The contributors
appraise the progress of institutional theory, varieties of realist
and liberal theory, operational code analysis, and other research
programs in international relations. Their analyses reveal the
strengths and limits of Lakatosian criteria and the need for
metatheoretical metrics for evaluating scientific progress.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!