Accounts of moral reasoning have tended either to ignore the
differences in what men count as good reasons for their moral
judgments, or, in emphasizing these differences, to imply that
anything whatsoever can count as a moral reason. This book shows
that both of these positions rest on a mistaken assumption, and by
rejecting this assumption brings out important features of moral
discourse. Although moral disagreement is seen to be far more
radical than empirical disagreement, a framework of agreement is
shown to be a precondition of moral discourse, and even of the
possibility of individual moral decision.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!