Ethical foreign policy has often been considered utopian,
unrealistic and potentially very dangerous. Dan Bulley argues for a
reconceptualisation of ethics as foreign policy, as both look to
how we can, and ought to, relate to others.
Inspired by the deconstructive thought of Jacques Derrida,
Bulley studies the ethical claims of British (1997-2007) and EU
(1999-2004) foreign policy. These claims are read against
themselves to illustrate their deep ambiguity. A textual analysis
of speeches, statements and interviews given by foreign policy
makers shows that a responsibility to save Africa, to protect
Iraqis, and to hospitably welcome the Balkans into the EU are also
irresponsible, inhospitable and unethical.
The author contends that foreign policies making a claim to
morality are ethical and unethical, in their own terms, suggesting
that while a truly ethical foreign policy remains ultimately
unachievable, it does not justify abandoning a responsible relation
to others. Rather, a negotiation of ethics as foreign policy
suggests potential individual, context-bound decisions which remain
open to contestation and permanent critique. Bulley argues that the
goal of ethical foreign policy must be maintained as a productive
hope of what is neither completely impossible, nor entirely
possible.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!