|
Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy > Philosophy of mind
|
Buy Now
Sweet Dreams - Philosophical Obstacles to a Science of Consciousness (Paperback, New Ed)
Loot Price: R1,132
Discovery Miles 11 320
|
|
|
Sweet Dreams - Philosophical Obstacles to a Science of Consciousness (Paperback, New Ed)
Series: Sweet Dreams
Expected to ship within 18 - 22 working days
|
Winner in the Psychology & Cognitive Science catagory of the
2005 Professional/Scholarly Publishing Annual Awards Competition
presented by the Association of American Publishers, Inc. In the
years since Daniel Dennett's influential "Consciousness Explained"
was published in 1991, scientific research on consciousness has
been a hotly contested battleground of rival theories--"so
rambunctious," Dennett observes, "that several people are writing
books just about the tumult." With "Sweet Dreams," Dennett returns
to the subject for "revision and renewal" of his theory of
consciousness, taking into account major empirical advances in the
field since 1991 as well as recent theoretical challenges. In
"Consciousness Explained," Dennett proposed to replace the
ubiquitous but bankrupt Cartesian Theater model (which posits a
privileged place in the brain where "it all comes together" for the
magic show of consciousness) with the Multiple Drafts Model.
Drawing on psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and artificial
intelligence, he asserted that human consciousness is essentially
the mental software that reorganizes the functional architecture of
the brain. In "Sweet Dreams," he recasts the Multiple Drafts Model
as the "fame in the brain" model, as a background against which to
examine the philosophical issues that "continue to bedevil the
field." With his usual clarity and brio, Dennett enlivens his
arguments with a variety of vivid examples. He isolates the "Zombic
Hunch" that distorts much of the theorizing of both philosophers
and scientists, and defends heterophenomenology, his "third-person"
approach to the science of consciousness, against persistent
misinterpretations and objections. The oldchallenge of Frank
Jackson's thought experiment about Mary the color scientist is
given a new rebuttal in the form of "RoboMary," while his
discussion of a famous card trick, "The Tuned Deck," is designed to
show that David Chalmers's Hard Problem is probably just a figment
of theorists' misexploited imagination. In the final essay, the
"intrinsic" nature of "qualia" is compared with the naively
imagined "intrinsic value" of a dollar in "Consciousness--How Much
is That in "Real" Money?"
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
You might also like..
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.