The end of the Cold War was supposed to bring a "peace dividend"
and the opportunity to redirect military policy in the United
States. Instead, according to Daniel Wirls, American politics
following the Cold War produced dysfunctional defense policies that
were exacerbated by the war on terror. Wirls's critical historical
narrative of the politics of defense in the United States during
this "decade of neglect" and the military buildup in Afghanistan
and Iraq explains how and why the U.S. military has become bloated
and aimless and what this means for long-term security.
Examining the recent history of U.S. military spending and
policy under presidents George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and George
W. Bush, Wirls finds that although spending decreased from the
close of the first Bush presidency through the early years of
Clinton's, both administrations preferred to tinker at the edges of
defense policy rather than redefine it. Years of political
infighting escalated the problem, leading to a military policy
stalemate as neither party managed to craft a coherent, winning
vision of national security. Wirls argues that the United States
has undermined its own long-term security through profligate and
often counterproductive defense policies while critical national
problems have gone unmitigated and unsolved.
This unified history of the politics of U.S. military policy
from the end of the Cold War through the beginning of the Obama
presidency provides a clear picture of why the United States is
militarily powerful but "otherwise insecure."
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!