Books > Law > Laws of other jurisdictions & general law > Constitutional & administrative law
|
Buy Now
The Appearance of Corruption - Testing the Supreme Court's Assumptions about Campaign Finance Reform (Hardcover)
Loot Price: R1,178
Discovery Miles 11 780
|
|
The Appearance of Corruption - Testing the Supreme Court's Assumptions about Campaign Finance Reform (Hardcover)
Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days
|
A critical analysis of the connections that the United States
Supreme Court has made between campaign finance regulations and
voters' behavior. The sanctity of political speech is a key element
of the United States Constitution and a cornerstone of the American
republic. When the Supreme Court linked political speech to
campaign finance in its landmark Buckley v. Valeo (1976) decision,
the modern era of campaign finance regulation was born. The
decision stated that in order to pass constitutional muster, any
laws limiting money in politics must be narrowly tailored and serve
a compelling state interest. The lone state interest the Court was
willing to entertain was the mitigation of corruption. In order to
reach this conclusion, the Court advanced a sophisticated
behavioral model that made assumptions about how laws affect
voters' opinions and behavior. These assumptions have received
surprisingly little attention until now. In The Appearance of
Corruption, Daron Shaw, Brian Roberts, and Mijeong Baek analyze the
connections that the Court made between campaign finance
regulations and voters' behavior. The court argued that an increase
in perceived corruption would lower engagement and turnout. Drawing
from original survey data and experiments, they confront the
question of what happens when the Supreme Court is wrong-and when
the foundation of over 40 years of jurisprudence is simply not
true. Even with the heightened awareness of campaign finance issues
that emerged in the wake of the 2010 Citizens United decision,
there is little empirical support for the Court's reasoning that
turnout would decline. A rigorous statistical analysis, this is the
first work to simultaneously name and test each and every one of
the Court's assumptions in the pre- and post-Citizen's United eras.
It will also fundamentally reshape how we think about campaign
finance regulation's effects on voter behavior.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
You might also like..
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.