When is military force an acceptable tool of foreign policy? Why
do democracies use force against each other? David R. Mares argues
that the key factors influencing political leaders in all types of
polities are the costs to their constituencies of using force and
whether the leader can survive their displeasure if the costs
exceed what they are willing to pay. Violent Peace proposes a
conceptual scheme for analyzing militarized conflict and supports
this framework with evidence from the history of Latin America. His
model has greater explanatory power when applied to this
conflict-ridden region than a model emphasizing U.S. power, levels
of democracy, or the balance of power.
Mares takes conflict as a given in international relations but
does not believe that large-scale violence must inevitably result,
arguing that it is the management of conflict, and not necessarily
its resolution, that should be the focus of students, scholars, and
practitioners of international relations. Mares argues that
deterrence represents the key to conflict management by directly
affecting the costs of using force. Conflicts escalate to violence
when leaders ignore the requisites for credible and ongoing
deterrence. Successful deterrence, he suggests, lies in a strategy
that combines diplomatic and military incentives, allowing
competition among heterogenous states to be managed in a way that
minimizes conflict and maximizes cooperation.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!