Adam Smith is popularly regarded as the ideological forefather
of laissez-faire capitalism, while Rousseau is seen as the
passionate advocate of the life of virtue in small, harmonious
communities and as a sharp critic of the ills of commercial
society. But, in fact, Smith had many of the same worries about
commercial society that Rousseau did and was strongly influenced by
his critique.
In this first book-length comparative study of these leading
eighteenth-century thinkers, Dennis Rasmussen highlights Smith's
sympathy with Rousseau's concerns and analyzes in depth the ways in
which Smith crafted his arguments to defend commercial society
against these charges. These arguments, Rasmussen emphasizes, were
pragmatic in nature, not ideological: it was Smith's view that, all
things considered, commercial society offered more benefits than
the alternatives.
Just because of this pragmatic orientation, Smith's approach can
be useful to us in assessing the pros and cons of commercial
society today and thus contributes to a debate that is too much
dominated by both dogmatic critics and doctrinaire champions of our
modern commercial society.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!