Over the last decade the regulatory evaluation of environmental and
public health risks has been one of the most legally controversial
areas of contemporary government activity. As this award-winning
work shows, legal disputes over risk evaluation are disputes over
administrative constitutionalism in that they are disputes over
what role law should play in constituting and limiting the power of
administrative risk regulators. Five case studies taken from five
different legal cultures demonstrate this point, and the work
concludes with a strong argument for re-orienting the focus of
scholarship in this area.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
Welcome to Loot.co.za!
Sign in / Register |Wishlists & Gift Vouchers |Help | Advanced search
