Books > Social sciences > Psychology > The self, ego, identity, personality
|
Buy Now
The Anatomy Of Human Destructiveness (Paperback, Reissue)
Loot Price: R473
Discovery Miles 4 730
You Save: R104
(18%)
|
|
The Anatomy Of Human Destructiveness (Paperback, Reissue)
(sign in to rate)
List price R577
Loot Price R473
Discovery Miles 4 730
You Save R104 (18%)
Expected to ship within 9 - 15 working days
|
Donate to Against Period Poverty
Total price: R493
Discovery Miles: 4 930
|
Hailed as an "original and far-reaching contribution" to
psychoanalytic theory and social thought, this is Fromm's ambitious
and rather complicated rebuttal of Lorenz' innate aggressive
instinct, built upon an amended version of the Freudian dichotomy
between Eros and Thanatos. Animals act by instinct but people have
"character-rooted passions," an inner map which mediates and is
largely formed by physiology and the social environment, which can
be either "biophilic" ("life-loving") or necrophilic
("death-loving"); considered as a set they constitute a person's
character. Aggressive acts can also be either life-serving and
hence "benign" or death-serving, hence "malignant"; while benign
aggression is reactive, self-terminating and undertaken in defense
of what is deemed to be a "vital" interest, malignant aggression
aims at controlling others, destruction and cruelty for its own
sake, for the pleasure the aggressor gets. In sane life-loving
societies it would be recognized as the pathology that it is;
malignant character-types like Stalin, Hitler and Himmler - Fromm's
models - would be "harmless" because they wouldn't have a chance to
come to power. But one might ask, is it possible to draw a line
between these categories? Are passions such as unquestioning
patriotism, greed, jealousy and vengeance less destructive to life
because the damage done was not consciously or unconsciously
intended? Don't we also need a set of standards by which we could
decide what "vital interests" to defend? And if the same goals can
be achieved by less aggressive means, how can such choices be
encouraged? Fromm's latest book - eclectic but. labyrinthine - digs
up the roots of man's pathology, but he has no life-promoting
prescriptions beyond those offered in his earlier Escape From
Freedom, The Sane Society and The Revolution of Hope. (Kirkus
Reviews)
In a world in which violence in every form seems to be increasing, Erich Fromm has treated this problem with deep perception in the most original and far-reaching work of his brilliant career.Fromm asks: what is there in the conditions of human existence to lead man to the orgies of destruction and violence in which he has indulged? By drawing on the findings of anthropology, palaeontogy, psychology and history; and including striking character analyses of Stalin, Hitler and Himmler, he shows how the failure to use our capacity for love andreason results in the development of the reverse: we wish to control life absolutely, or to destroy it.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
You might also like..
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.