This important and much-disputed essay edited by Ezra Pound from
the manuscript of Ernest Fenollosa (and published in Instigations,
London, 1920) has since gone through several editions, despite the
ridicule of such sinologists as Professor George Kennedy of Yale,
who called it "a small mass of confusion.
The old theory as to the nature of the Chinese written character
(which Pound and Fenollosa followed) is that the written character
is ideogrammic--a stylized picture of the thing or concept it
represents. The opposing theory (which prevails today among
scholars) is that the character may have had pictorial origins in
prehistoric times but that these origins have been obscured in all
but a few very simple cases, and that in any case native writers
don't have the original pictorial meaning in mind as they
write.
Whether Pound proceeded on false premises remains an academic
question. Let the pedants rave. An important extension of imagist
technique in poetry was gained by Pound's perception of the
essentially poetic nature of the Chinese character as it is still
written.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!