The author shows through a careful analysis of the law that
restrictive immunity does not have vox populi in developing
countries, and that it lacks usus. He also argues that forum law,
i.e. the lex fori is a creature of sovereignty and between equals
before the law, only what is understood and acknowledged as law
among states must be applied in as much as the international legal
system is horizontal.
Furthermore, the state never acts as a juridical or natural
person and, therefore, in logical terms, its functions cannot be
divided into potere politico and persona civile, as a prelude to
determine jurisdiction. The said Italian doctrine therefore is ex
facie erroneous, and that a simple dichotomy between absolute
immunity and restrictive immunity wholly predicated on the nature
test alone would not be helpful in promoting justice. Hence,
arbitration and comparative dominant theory are suggested instead
in the resolution of this elusive problem.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!