When the United States invaded Iraq, President Bush made it
clear: the U.S. was not fighting the Iraqi people. Rather, all
quarrels were solely with Iraq's leadership. This kind of assertion
remains frequent in foreign affairs--sanctions or military actions
are imposed on a nation not because of its people, but because of
its misguided leaders. Although the distinction might seem pedantic
since the people suffer regardless, "Punishing the Prince" reveals
how targeting individual leaders for punishment rather than the
nations they represent creates incentives for cooperation between
nations and leaves room for future relations with pariah
states.
"Punishing the Prince" demonstrates that theories of leader
punishment explain a great deal about international behavior and
interstate relations. The book examines the impact that domestic
political institutions have on whether citizens hold their leaders
accountable for international commitments and shows that the
degrees to which citizens are able to remove leaders shape the
dynamics of interstate relations and leader turnover. Through
analyses of sovereign debt, international trade, sanctions, and
crisis bargaining, Fiona McGillivray and Alastair Smith also
uncover striking differences in patterns of relations between
democratic and autocratic states. Bringing together a vast body of
information, "Punishing the Prince" offers new ways of thinking
about international relations.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!