This volume presents a cogent analysis of the legal and economic
consequences arising from expansion in the doctrine of strict
liability and the corresponding decrease in the importance of
proving fault. Vandall's goal is to illuminate the role of strict
liability in the largely unheralded and informal development of the
American compensation system. To this end, he examines and explains
the widening of strict liability during the last 121 years, with
particular emphasis on the past 29 years.
Vandall begins with a historical overview of strict liability,
arguing that the policies which have supported the growth of strict
liability within products liability also support its application in
other areas. By comparing and contrasting the U.S. and British
compensation systems, he shows that the U.S. has been drawn towards
the adoption of strict liability because it lacks socialized
medicine. Subsequent chapters set forth various tests for strict
liability and critique the negligence-efficiency theory. Turning to
a discussion of contemporary practice, Vandall sets out the present
scope of strict liability and asserts that a case can be made for
the extension of strict liability far beyond the area of products
liability. Finally, Vandall evaluates the reforms aimed at strict
liability over the last ten years and concludes that the suggested
return to negligence is unwarranted and not supported by facts.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!