The debate on how mankind should respond to climate change is
diverse, as the appropriate strategy depends on global as well as
local circumstances.
As scientists are denied the possibility of conducting
experiments with the real climate, only climate models can give
insights into man-induced climate change, by experimenting with
digital climates under varying conditions and by extrapolating past
and future states into the future.
But the nature of models is a purely representational one. A
model is good if it is believed to represent the relevant processes
of a natural system well. However, a model and its results, in
particular in the case of climate models which interconnect
countless hypotheses, is only to some extent testable, although an
advanced infrastructure of evaluation strategies has been developed
involving strategies of model intercomparison, ensemble prognoses,
uncertainty metrics on the system and component levels. The
complexity of climate models goes hand in hand with uncertainties,
but uncertainty is in conflict with socio-political expectations.
However, certain predictions belong to the realm of desires and
ideals rather than to applied science. Today s attempt to define
and classify uncertainty in terms of likelihood and confidence
reflect this awareness of uncertainty as an integral part of human
knowledge, in particular on knowledge about possible future
developments. The contributions in this book give a first hand
insight into scientific strategies in dealing with uncertainty by
using simulation models and into social, political and economical
requirements in future projections on climate change. Do these
strategies and requirements meet each other or fail?
The debate on how mankind should respond to climate change is
diverse, as the appropriate strategy depends on global as well as
local circumstances. As scientists are denied the possibility of
conducting experiments with the real climate, only climate models
can give insights into man-induced climate change, by experimenting
with digital climates under varying conditions and by extrapolating
past and future states into the future. But the 'nature' of models
is a purely representational one. A model is good if it is believed
to represent the relevant processes of a natural system well.
However, a model and its results, in particular in the case of
climate models which interconnect countless hypotheses, is only to
some extent testable, although an advanced infrastructure of
evaluation strategies has been developed involving strategies of
model intercomparison, ensemble prognoses, uncertainty metrics on
the system and component levels. The complexity of climate models
goes hand in hand with uncertainties, but uncertainty is in
conflict with socio-political expectations. However, certain
predictions belong to the realm of desires and ideals rather than
to applied science. Today's attempt to define and classify
uncertainty in terms of likelihood and confidence reflect this
awareness of uncertainty as an integral part of human knowledge, in
particular on knowledge about possible future developments. The
contributions in this book give a first hand insight into
scientific strategies in dealing with uncertainty by using
simulation models and into social, political and economical
requirements in future projections on climate change. Do these
strategies and requirements meet each other or fail?
Gabriele Gramelsberger is Principal Investigator of the
Collaborative Research Project is Principal Investigator of the
Collaborative Research Project
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!