Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy > Ethics & moral philosophy
|
Buy Now
Personhood, Ethics, and Animal Cognition - Situating Animals in Hare's Two Level Utilitarianism (Hardcover, New)
Loot Price: R2,801
Discovery Miles 28 010
|
|
Personhood, Ethics, and Animal Cognition - Situating Animals in Hare's Two Level Utilitarianism (Hardcover, New)
Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days
|
R.M. Hare was one of the most important ethical theorists of the
20th century, and one of his graduate students, Peter Singer,
became famous for his writings on animals and personhood. Singer
now says that he endorses Hare's "two-level utilitarianism," and he
has invoked the theory's distinction between "critical thinking"
and thinking in terms of "intuitive level rules" in response to
certain objections to his conclusions on several issues. Hare,
however, never published a systematic treatment of how his theory
applies to issues in animal ethics, and he avoided the concept of
"personhood." Gary Varner here fills this gap by defending the
moral legitimacy of distinguishing among "persons," "near-persons,"
and "the merely sentient" within Harean two-level utilitarianism.
He explores the implications of this distinction by applying the
resulting ethical system to our treatment of animals, and shows how
the results contrast with the more abolitionist conclusions reached
by Singer on the same issues. In the process, he presents a new
philosophical defense of two-level utilitarianism and its
metaethical foundation (universal prescriptivism), and he
significantly expands Hare's account of how "intuitive level rules"
function in moral thinking, based on recent empirical research. The
book also draws heavily on empirical research on consciousness and
cognition in non-human animals as a way of approaching the question
of which animals, if any, are "persons," or at least "near-persons.
Philosophers, including those interested in utilitarianism in
general or Hare in particular, as well as others interested in
animal ethics or the debate over personhood, will find Varner's
argument of great interest. "Professor Varner's earlier work, In
Nature's Interests, is a very fine book. It has achieved a high
level of respect from those working in the field, and is often seen
as having set a new standard of debate in environmental ethics.
That means that a new book by Professor Varner will be received
with considerable interest. Varner draws on extensive recent
empirical research regarding the degree to which animals are
self-conscious and uses this information as the basis for the most
serious discussion I have yet seen of whether any nonhuman animals
can be considered 'persons'. There is, to my knowledge, no other
book that goes into these issues anywhere near as deeply, in the
context of assessing their significance for the normative issues of
the wrongness of taking life, or other issues relating to ethical
decision-making regarding our treatment of animals and some humans.
I have no doubt that this book will, like In Nature's Interests, be
seen as making an important contribution to the topics it covers."
- Peter Singer, University Center for Human Values, Princeton
University
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.