Going back at least to the writings of John Stuart Mill and
Jean-Jacques Rousseau, people have argued for and against
maintaining a state of nature. Is there an inherent virtue in
leaving alone a naturally occurring condition, or does the human
species thrive when we find ways to improve our circumstances? This
volume probes whether "nature" and "the natural" are capable of
guiding moral deliberations in policy making.
Drawing on philosophy, religion, and political science, this
book examines three questions central to debates over the idea of
"nature" in human action. Conceptually, it asks what the term
means, how it should be considered, and if it is, even in part, a
social construct. From a moral perspective, the contributors
question if being "natural" is itself of value or if its worth is
only as a means to advance other morally acceptable ends.
Politically, essays discuss whether appeals to nature can and
should affect public policy and, if so, whether they are moral
trump cards or should instead be fitted alongside or weighed
against other concerns.
Achieving consensus on these questions has proven elusive and
seems unattainable. This should not, however, be an obstacle to
moving the debate forward. By bringing together disparate
approaches to addressing these concepts, "The Ideal of Nature"
suggests the possibility of intermediate positions that move beyond
the usual full-throated defense and blanket dismissal found in much
of the debate. Scholars of bioethics, environmental philosophy,
religious studies, sociology, public policy, and political theory
will find much merit in this book's lively discussion.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!