Disputes over hazardous waste sites usually are resolved by
giving greater weight to expert opinion over public
"not-in-my-back-yard" reactions. Challenging the assumption that
policy experts are better able to discern the general welfare,
Gregory E. McAvoy here proposes that citizen opinion and democratic
dissent occupy a vital, constructive place in environmental
policymaking.
McAvoy explores the issues of citizen rationality, the tension
between democracy and technocracy, and the link between public
opinion and policy in the case of an unsuccessful attempt to site a
hazardous waste facility in Minnesota. He shows how the site was
defeated by citizens who had reasonable doubts over the need for
the facility.
Offering a comprehensive look at the policymaking process,
McAvoy examines the motivations of public officials, the resources
they have for shaping opinion, the influence of interest groups,
and the evolution of waste reduction programs in Minnesota and
other states. Integrating archival material, interviews, and
quantitative survey data, he argues that NIMBY movements can bring
miscalculations to light and provide an essential check on policy
experts' often partisan views.
This book will be of value to those who work or study in the
fields of hazardous waste policy, facility siting, environmental
policy, public policy, public administration, and political
science.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!