As basic exploratory research, this study was conducted to describe
the paradigms of federal, state, and local negotiators and tactical
operators and to determine the extent to which these paradigms
contribute to potential conflict between the negotiation and
tactical teams. A review of the literature indicates that conflict
does indeed exist and is the result of differing paradigms due to
minimal or nonexistent personal and professional relationships
among the negotiators and tactical operators. According to the
literature, this conflict can be explained from the standpoint of
symbolic interaction, social construction, group dynamics, and
intergroup conflict theories. These theories posit that differing
group cultures that develop and thrive without interaction tend to
conflict when trying to achieve their goals in shared situations as
a result of perceived incompatible goal attainment.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!