History is replete with instances of what might, or might not,
have been. By calling something contingent, at a minimum we are
saying that it did not have to be as it is. Things could have been
otherwise, and they would have been otherwise if something had
happened differently. This collection of original essays examines
the significance of contingency in the study of politics. That is,
how to study unexpected, accidental, or unknowable political
phenomena in a systematic fashion. Yitzhak Rabin is assassinated.
Saddam Hussein invades Kuwait. Hurricane Katrina hits New Orleans.
How might history be different had these events not happened? How
should social scientists interpret the significance of these events
and can such unexpected outcomes be accounted for in a systematic
way or by theoretical models? Can these unpredictable events be
predicted for? Political Contingency addresses these and other
related questions, providing theoretical and historical
perspectives on the topic, empirical case studies, and the
methodological challenges that the fact of contingency poses for
the study of politics.
Contributors: Sonu Bedi, Traci Burch, Jennifer L. Hochschild,
Gregory A. Huber, Courtney Jung, David R. Mayhew, Philip Pettit,
Andreas Schedler, Mark R. Shulman, Robert G. Shulman, Ian Shapiro,
Susan Stokes, Elisabeth Jean Wood, and David Wootton
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!