Ina Peters analyzes how collective identities and collective action
frames have contributed to the persistence and eventual
fragmentation of the collective action against the Belo Monte Dam.
Reconstructing the rationale of the conflict, Ina Peters addresses
theoretical research gaps regarding the dynamics - particularly
cohesion and fragmentation - in social movements. The study
considers the influence of the regional context and the
applicability of Western theories in non-Western case studies. It
is based on primary data that was collected through semistructured
interviews and analyzed in detail by means of a combined top-down
and bottom-up procedure based on the grounded theory methodology.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!