A unique introduction to the constitutional arguments for and
against the right to abortion In January 1973, the Supreme
Court’s opinion in Roe v. Wade struck down most of the country's
abortion laws and held for the first time that the Constitution
guarantees women the right to safe and legal abortions. Nearly five
decades later, in 2022, the Court’s 5-4 decision in Dobbs v.
Jackson Women's Health Organization overturned Roe and eliminated
the constitutional right, stunning the nation. Instead of finally
resolving the constitutional issues, Dobbs managed to bring new
attention to them while sparking a debate about the Supreme
Court’s legitimacy. Originally published in 2005, What Roe v.
Wade Should Have Said asked eleven distinguished constitutional
scholars to rewrite the opinions in this landmark case in light of
thirty years’ experience but making use only of sources available
at the time of the original decision. Offering the best arguments
for and against the constitutional right to abortion, the
contributors have produced a series of powerful essays that get to
the heart of this fascinating case. In addition, Jack Balkin gives
a detailed historical introduction that chronicles the Roe
litigation—and the constitutional and political clashes that
followed it—and explains the Dobbs decision and its aftermath.
General
Imprint: |
New York University Press
|
Country of origin: |
United States |
Release date: |
2023 |
Editors: |
Jack M. Balkin
|
Dimensions: |
229 x 152mm (L x W) |
Format: |
Hardcover - Trade binding
|
Pages: |
344 |
ISBN-13: |
978-1-4798-2448-9 |
Categories: |
Books
|
LSN: |
1-4798-2448-8 |
Barcode: |
9781479824489 |
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!