This study comprises an analysis of the legitimacy of dissent by
Admiral Sharp and General Westmoreland following the Vietnam War.
The author does this by using Huntington's theories of objective
civilian control of the military and his four different cases of
dissent to devise a two-step dissent analysis model. The model
addresses first, whether the military officer has a valid message
of dissent, and second, whether there are extenuating circumstances
to justify going directly to the public with the dissent rather
than using more traditional and appropriate avenues. The conclusion
is that Sharp and Westmoreland's dissent was inappropriate because
they criticized President Johnson on political grounds in which
they did not have the requisite expertise. The study then briefly
addresses recent dissent during Operation Iraqi Freedom. Again, the
study found that the dissent presented failed to meet the criteria
for legitimacy. The retired generals challenged Secretary of
Defense Rumsfeld on political grounds. Additionally, there was not
a sufficiently strong case for going directly to the public rather
than using their chain-of-command while still on active duty.
General
Imprint: |
Biblioscholar
|
Country of origin: |
United States |
Release date: |
December 2012 |
First published: |
December 2012 |
Authors: |
Jaime M. Schofield
|
Dimensions: |
246 x 189 x 4mm (L x W x T) |
Format: |
Paperback - Trade
|
Pages: |
66 |
ISBN-13: |
978-1-288-41661-5 |
Categories: |
Books >
Social sciences >
Education >
General
Promotions
|
LSN: |
1-288-41661-X |
Barcode: |
9781288416615 |
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!