One of the principal moral and psychological problems of our time
is whether humane ideals can be defended. Loss of faith in the
objectivity of ethics has encouraged a sense of hopelessness. The
notion that no ideal is better than any other, that a humane
commitment has no rational advantage over Nietzsche's contempt for
ordinary people, has been accused of leaving our civilization
without self-confidence or a purpose. James R. Flynn rejects
attempts to salvage ethical objectivity as futile and
counterproductive. Instead, he uses philosophical analysis to
demonstrate the relevance of logic and evidence to moral debate. He
then uses modern social science to refute racists, Social
Darwinists, Nietzsche, and the meritocracy thesis of "The Bell
Curve." Flynn concludes that the great post-Enlightenment
project--justice for all races and classes, the reduction of
inequality, and the abolition of privilege--retains its moral
dignity and relevance.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!