A century before Jack the Ripper haunted the streets of London,
another predator held sway. In the late eighteenth century, the
city was gripped by fear, outrage, and Monster Mania. A psychopath
who had lashed out violently at over fifty women during a two-year
crime spree roamed the city. After stalking and verbally harassing
his unsuspecting victims, the Monster would assault them with
blades shrewdly crafted for his methods of attack. Sometimes he
jabbed his victims squarely in the hips and buttocks. Some he
kicked in the backside with knives fastened to his knee. Others he
invited to smell an artificial nosegay, only to stab the fine lady
right in the nose with a sharp spike hidden within the flowers. The
details of these encounters--the bloodshed, the women's ripped
clothing, the dark figure calmly observing his victim's screams of
anguish before disappearing down the closest alley seconds before
help arrived--became deeply ingrained in London's collective
psyche. After an immense reward was offered for the capture of the
perpetrator by the wealthy philanthropist John Julius Angerstein,
one of the founders of Lloyd's, the public's excitement rose. Armed
vigilantes patrolling the streets only added to the mayhem, and
newspaper reports of each attack roused even greater panic.
Fashionable ladies did not dare walk outdoors without copper pans
over their petticoats to protect them against the Monster's rapier.
And still, the attacks continued.Finally in June 1790, an ungainly
young Welshman named Rhynwick Williams, who worked in a factory for
artificial flowers, was arrested as the London Monster. He appeared
an unlikely Monster, with a reasonable alibi for one of the worst
attacks. But after two long, ludicrous trials, where he was
defended energetically by the eccentric Irish poet, Theophilus
Swift, Williams was convicted. Was Rhynwick Williams guilty after
all? Or was he unlucky enough to fall into the hands of authorities
when they needed someone, anyone, to pay for the Monster's peculiar
crimes? Was there even a Monster at all? Considerable doubt has
been cast. In "The London Monster," Jan Bondeson writes a lively,
detailed account of one of London's most notorious sons and
assesses evidence for the guilt or innocence of the convicted
Williams. He presents a wealth of contemporary evidence from
learned and popular sources, as well as research on mass hysterias
and moral panics, to reinterpret Monster Mania and compare it to
historical and modern instances of similar phenomena. Indeed, in
the magnitude of public frenzy it incited, the story of the London
Monster bears similarities to the Ripper murders in 1888; in its
stature as urban legend, it is of the bogeyman tradition of Sweeney
Todd, the Demon Barber of Fleet Street. As Bondeson reveals, the
London Monster occupies a unique space in London's criminal history
and imagination, somewhere between fact and fiction.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!