Every liberal democracy has laws or codes against hate speech
except the United States. For constitutionalists, regulation of
hate speech violates the First Amendment and damages a free
society. Against this absolutist view, Jeremy Waldron argues
powerfully that hate speech should be regulated as part of our
commitment to human dignity and to inclusion and respect for
members of vulnerable minorities.
Causing offense by depicting a religious leader as a terrorist
in a newspaper cartoon, for example is not the same as launching a
libelous attack on a group s dignity, according to Waldron, and it
lies outside the reach of law. But defamation of a minority group,
through hate speech, undermines a public good that can and should
be protected: the basic assurance of inclusion in society for all
members. A social environment polluted by anti-gay leaflets, Nazi
banners, and burning crosses sends an implicit message to the
targets of such hatred: your security is uncertain and you can
expect to face humiliation and discrimination when you leave your
home.
Free-speech advocates boast of despising what racists say but
defending to the death their right to say it. Waldron finds this
emphasis on intellectual resilience misguided and points instead to
the threat hate speech poses to the lives, dignity, and reputations
of minority members. Finding support for his view among
philosophers of the Enlightenment, Waldron asks us to move beyond
knee-jerk American exceptionalism in our debates over the serious
consequences of hateful speech."
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!