0
Your cart

Your cart is empty

Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy > Ethics & moral philosophy

Buy Now

Ought Implies Kant - A Reply to the Consequentialist Critique (Hardcover, New) Loot Price: R2,542
Discovery Miles 25 420
Ought Implies Kant - A Reply to the Consequentialist Critique (Hardcover, New): Joel Marks

Ought Implies Kant - A Reply to the Consequentialist Critique (Hardcover, New)

Joel Marks

 (sign in to rate)
Loot Price R2,542 Discovery Miles 25 420 | Repayment Terms: R238 pm x 12*

Bookmark and Share

Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days

Ought Implies Kant offers an original defense of the ethical theory of Immanuel Kant, and develops an extension of that theory's account of moral duty to include direct duties to nonhuman animals. The discussion centers on a critical examination of consequentialism, the view that the rightness or wrongness of an action is determined solely by its consequences. Kantianism, by contrast, claims that the core of ethics is to treat all persons-or, in Joel Marks's view, all living beings-as ends-in-themselves. The consequentialist criterion would seem to permit, indeed require, violating the dignity of persons (not to mention the dignity of other animals) if this would result in a better outcome. This volume treats the consequentialist challenge to Kantian ethics in several novel ways. To begin with, the utilitarian version of consequentialism is delineated and defended by means of a conceptual device dubbed by the author as the Consequentialist Continuum. Marks then provides an exhaustive and definitive exposition of the relatively neglected Epistemic Objection to utilitarianism. While acknowledging the intuitive appeal of utilitarianism's core conviction-that we should always do what is for the best-Marks argues that this is an impossible injunction to fulfill, or even to attempt to fulfill, because all of the relevant results of our actions can never be known. Kantianism is then introduced as a viable alternative account of our ethical obligations. Marks argues that Kantianism is well within the scope of normal human competence and conforms equally well to our ethical intuitions once the theory's proper interpretation is appreciated. However, Kant's own version must be extended to accommodate the rightful moral consideration we owe to nonhuman animals. Finally, Marks employs the notion of a Consequentialist Illusion to explain utilitarianism's hold on our moral intuitions, while developing a form of Consequentialist Kantianism to address them. An original and penetrating examination of a central debate

General

Imprint: Lexington Books
Country of origin: United States
Release date: 2009
First published: December 2008
Authors: Joel Marks
Dimensions: 238 x 163 x 14mm (L x W x T)
Format: Hardcover
Pages: 132
Edition: New
ISBN-13: 978-0-7391-2877-0
Categories: Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy > Ethics & moral philosophy > General
Books > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy > Ethics & moral philosophy > General
LSN: 0-7391-2877-9
Barcode: 9780739128770

Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate? Let us know about it.

Does this product have an incorrect or missing image? Send us a new image.

Is this product missing categories? Add more categories.

Review This Product

No reviews yet - be the first to create one!

Partners