Since the 1950s, many philosophers of science have attacked
positivism--the theory that scientific knowledge is grounded in
objective reality. Reconstructing the history of these critiques,
John H. Zammito argues that while so-called postpositivist theories
of science are very often invoked, they actually provide little
support for fashionable postmodern approaches to science studies.
Zammito shows how problems that Quine and Kuhn saw in the
philosophy of the natural sciences inspired a turn to the
philosophy of language for resolution. This linguistic turn led to
claims that science needs to be situated in both historical and
social contexts, but the claims of recent "science studies" only
deepened the philosophical quandary. In essence, Zammito argues
that none of the problems with positivism provides the slightest
justification for denigrating empirical inquiry and scientific
practice, delivering quite a blow to the "discipline" postmodern
science studies.
Filling a gap in scholarship to date, "A Nice Derangement of
Epistemes" will appeal to historians, philosophers, philosophers of
science, and the broader scientific community.
General
Imprint: |
University of Chicago Press
|
Country of origin: |
United States |
Release date: |
February 2004 |
First published: |
February 2004 |
Authors: |
John H. Zammito
|
Dimensions: |
152 x 228 x 22mm (L x W x T) |
Format: |
Paperback
|
Pages: |
406 |
Edition: |
2nd ed. |
ISBN-13: |
978-0-226-97862-8 |
Categories: |
Books >
Humanities >
Philosophy >
General
Books >
Philosophy >
General
Promotions
|
LSN: |
0-226-97862-1 |
Barcode: |
9780226978628 |
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!