This new study questions whether peacekeeping fundamentally
changed between the Cold War and Post-Cold War periods.
Focusing on contrasting case studies of the Congo, Cyprus,
Somalia and Angola, as well as more recent operations in Sierra
Leone and East Timor, it probes new evidence with clarity and
rigour.
The authors conclude that most peacekeeping operations - whether
in the Cold War or Post-Cold War periods - were flawed due to the
failure of the UN member states to agree upon achievable
objectives, the precise nature of the operations and provision of
the necessary resources, and unrealistic post-1989 expectations
that UN peacekeeping operations could be adapted to the changed
international circumstances. The study concludes by looking at the
Brahimi reforms, questions whether these are realistically
achievable and looks at their impact on contemporary peace
operations in Sierra Leone, East Timor and elsewhere.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!