A "small but strategic" sample of 63 California women, in their
late twenties to mid-thirties, were given questionnaires by
sociologist Gerson (New York U.) to chart their life choices. Her
findings: these choices result neither from childhood upbringing
nor external pressures but from a combination of these two forces.
Not much intellectual excitement there, but then Gerson's study is
oriented more toward sociological debates than toward public
issues. Rather than aligning herself with either the "structural
coercion" approach (the power of male-controlled social
institutions over women) or the purely "voluntarist" approach (the
role of "female personality" and gender socialization), Gerson
believes that "in the context of structural constraint, women
actively build their lives out of the materials provided by larger
social forces." The big pattern shows some women, in the course of
their lives, veering toward domesticity (19), some away from it
(22), and others remaining constant - whether domestic (11) or
career-oriented (11). Among those rejecting domesticity, some women
were reacting against the fragility of relationships ("I could see
that this white knight. . . was not going to come up and carry me
away into the great, glorious sunset"); others were responding
variously to tight household finances, disillusionment with
housework, and improved work opportunities. Logically, those who
moved closer to domesticity show the reverse: personal
relationships take precedence, job opportunities become blocked,
and/or domesticity develops its own allure. Whatever the choices,
"inherent dilemmas and contradictions" remain - with "structural
ambiguity" resulting from the ongoing flux in work and family
patterns. The non-domestic road may be "rough and uncertain," but
traditional domesticity offers "meager social supports and rewards
for childrearing. . ." Summing up the life courses of her
working-class and middle-class women, Gerson concludes: "Some have
gained; some have lost; and most have gained in some respects and
lost in others." This, along with the idea that new social
cleavages have resulted, we already knew. An academic exercise,
then, rather like Mirra Komarovsky's Women in College (p. 268) -
but little more. (Kirkus Reviews)
How do women choose between work and family commitments? And what
are the causes, limits, and consequences of the "subtle revolution"
in women's choices over the 1960s and 1970s? To answer these
questions, Kathleen Gerson analyzes the experiences of a carefully
selected group of middle-class and working-class women who were
young adults in the 1970s. Their informative life histories reveal
the emerging social forces in American society that have led
today's women to face several difficult choices.
General
Imprint: |
University of California Press
|
Country of origin: |
United States |
Series: |
California Series on Social Choice and Political Economy, 4 |
Release date: |
March 1986 |
First published: |
1985 |
Authors: |
Kathleen Gerson
|
Dimensions: |
229 x 152 x 20mm (L x W x T) |
Format: |
Paperback - Trade
|
Pages: |
350 |
Edition: |
Revised |
ISBN-13: |
978-0-520-05745-6 |
Categories: |
Books >
Social sciences >
Sociology, social studies >
Gender studies >
Women's studies >
General
|
LSN: |
0-520-05745-7 |
Barcode: |
9780520057456 |
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!