Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Political structure & processes > Constitution, government & the state
|
Buy Now
Repugnant Laws - Judicial Review of Acts of Congress from the Founding to the Present (Paperback)
Loot Price: R1,057
Discovery Miles 10 570
|
|
Repugnant Laws - Judicial Review of Acts of Congress from the Founding to the Present (Paperback)
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
Winner: Thomas M. Cooley Book Prize Thomas M. Cooley Book Prize
Choice Outstanding Academic Title When the Supreme Court strikes
down favored legislation, politicians cry judicial activism. When
the law is one politicians oppose, the court is heroically righting
a wrong. In our polarized moment of partisan fervor, the Supreme
Court's routine work of judicial review is increasingly viewed
through a political lens, decried by one side or the other as
judicial overreach, or 'legislating from the bench.' But is this
really the case? Keith E. Whittington asks in Repugnant Laws, a
first-of-its-kind history of judicial review. A thorough
examination of the record of judicial review requires first a
comprehensive inventory of relevant cases. To this end, Whittington
revises the extant catalog of cases in which the court has struck
down a federal statute and adds to this, for the first time, a
complete catalog of cases upholding laws of Congress against
constitutional challenges. With reference to this inventory,
Whittington is then able to offer a reassessment of the prevalence
of judicial review, an account of how the power of judicial review
has evolved over time, and a persuasive challenge to the idea of an
antidemocratic, heroic court. In this analysis, it becomes apparent
that that the court is political and often partisan, operating as a
political ally to dominant political coalitions; vulnerable and
largely unable to sustain consistent opposition to the policy
priorities of empowered political majorities; and
quasi-independent, actively exercising the power of judicial review
to pursue the justices' own priorities within bounds of what is
politically tolerable. The court, Repugnant Laws suggests, is a
political institution operating in a political environment to
advance controversial principles, often with the aid of political
leaders who sometimes encourage and generally tolerate the judicial
nullification of federal laws because it serves their own interests
to do so. In the midst of heated battles over partisan and activist
Supreme Court justices, Keith Whittington's work reminds us that,
for better or for worse, the court reflects the politics of its
time.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.