|
Books > Law > Laws of other jurisdictions & general law > Constitutional & administrative law
|
Buy Now
Whom Does the Constitution Command? - A Conceptual Analysis with Practical Implications (Hardcover)
Loot Price: R2,546
Discovery Miles 25 460
|
|
|
Whom Does the Constitution Command? - A Conceptual Analysis with Practical Implications (Hardcover)
Expected to ship within 18 - 22 working days
|
Alexander and Horton have attempted to untangle one of the most
difficult and potentially far-reaching questions in constitutional
law: at what point does constitutional law leave off and `plain old
law' remain to occupy the US legal system's field of play? In
addressing this question the authors take on two of the most murky
concepts in constitutional law, `state action; and `under color of
law.' In their attempt to make sense of these notions they develop
models that potentially could provide coherent, principled answers
to the problems created by the Supreme Court in its decisions in
this area. . . . This work, the first monographic treatment of this
question, is written purposely at a fairly high level of
abstraction and is clearly intended for advanced students and
judicial decision makers. Recommended for advanced students. Choice
Despite the guidelines provided in the Constitution, many
fundamental constitutional issues remain open to debate after two
centuries. One of the thorniest centers on the division of
authority. Who is actually mandated by the U.S. Constitution to
carry out the duties it imposes? Alexander and Horton address this
question by developing several models of constitutional
interpretation and applying them to state action, under color of
law, and other complex doctrines in constitutional jurisprudence
that have been created to deal with problems of distinguishing
unconstitutional from merely illegal authority. Presenting three
basic analytical models--legalist, naturalist, and
governmental--together with several possible permutations, the
authors clarify the assumptions underlying these current doctrinal
tangles and illuminate many conflicts and inner inconsistencies of
modern constitutional law. They examine the implications of each
model in terms of its application to relevant court precedent and
the way it would deal with specific constitutional provisions such
as the Thirteenth and Fourth Amendments and the Commerce Clause.
The authors conclude that only two of the possible models can be
considered to be principled.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
You might also like..
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.