The conditions that shaped the rise and expansion of American
social science are rapidly changing, and with them, the terms of
its relationship with power and policy. As globalization has
diminished the role of the state as the locus of public policy in
favor of NGOs, multinational corporations and other private
entities, it has raised important questions about the future of the
social sciences and their universalist pretensions.
As dean of Columbia University's School of International and
Public Affairs, Lisa Anderson has a unique vantage point on the
intersection of social sciences, particularly political science,
and public-policy formation and implementation. How do, or should,
the research and findings of the academy affect foreign or domestic
policy today? Why are politicians often quick to dismiss professors
as irrelevant, their undertakings purely "academic," while scholars
often shrink from engagement as agents of social or political
change? There is a tension at work here, and it reveals a deeper
compromise that arose as the modern social sciences were born in
the nursery of late nineteenth century American liberalism: social
scientists would dedicate themselves to the pursuit of objective,
empirically verifiable truth, while relinquishing the exercise of
power to governments and their agents. Anderson argues that this
compromise helped underwrite the expansion of American influence in
the twentieth century, and that it needs serious reexamination at
the dawn of the twenty-first.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!