This study uses basic economic analysis as a technique to
comment critically on the original meaning and the interpretation
of those clauses of the Constitution that have particular bearing
on the economy. Many new conclusions are markedly different from
those of the Supreme Court and earlier commentators. Conant's view
is that the commerce clause and the equal protection clause, if
they had been construed consistently with their comprehensive
original meanings, would have given much greater federal protection
against state laws that impaire free markets.
Economic policy for the nation was vested in Congress. To the
extent that special interests could buy congressional favor for
their anticompetitive activities, free markets were impaired within
constraints as interpreted by the court. These decisions have been
criticized for their failure to incorporate the antimonopoly
tradition in the Ninth Amendment and their failure to recognize
equal protection of laws incorporated into the Fifth Amendment.
Conant holds that statutory controls of the economy are justifiable
in economic theory if they are designed to remedy market failures
and thereby increase efficiency. If statutes are passed to
interfere with markets and create market inefficiencies for the
benefit of special interest groups, they should be condemned under
the standards of normative microeconomics. There are four main
classes of market failure: monopoly, externalities, public goods,
and informational asymmetry. This masterful analysis examines all
four reasons for market failure in depth.
Litigation costs are analogous to transaction costs. If legal
principles and rules are clearly and precisely defined by the
Supreme Court when they are first appealed, litigation and its
costs should be minimized. Conant claims that if legal principles
or rules are uncertain because they lack definable standards, the
number of legal actions filed and litigation costs will be much
greater. This promotes additional litigation challenging the many
statutes enacted to remedy asserted market failures in an expanding
industrial economy. This work brilliantly addresses the danger to
the economy in court rulings seeking to legislate standards of
reasonableness.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!