Although the protection of individuals' interests against
administrative actions is still primarily the domain of the
judiciary, most legal systems nowadays also assign this task to
ombudsmen. This can potentially lead to tension between the two
institutions and can affect their relations, and therefore needs
coordination. This book investigates whether relations between the
judiciary and ombudsmen exist at all, how their respective tasks
and competences influence one another and how they are coordinated.
It contains a comprehensive and comparative study on the
coordination of the relations between ombudsmen and the judiciary
in three considerably different legal systems, namely the
Netherlands, England and the European Union. The author identifies
three levels of possible coordination: institutional coordination,
case coordination and normative coordination. He explores and
compares the statutory rules, the case law of the judiciary and
ombudsprudence. In addition, he draws from experiences shared
through interviews with ombudsmen, judges and employees of
ombudsman offices. In doing so, he demonstrates that several
improvements to the ombudsmen-judiciary relations are required
General
| Imprint: |
Intersentia
|
| Country of origin: |
United Kingdom |
| Series: |
Ius Commune Europaeum, 125 |
| Release date: |
March 2014 |
| First published: |
March 2014 |
| Authors: |
Milan Remac
|
| Dimensions: |
236 x 172mm (L x W) |
| Format: |
Paperback
|
| Pages: |
424 |
| ISBN-13: |
978-1-78068-218-1 |
| Categories: |
Books >
Law >
General
Promotions
|
| LSN: |
1-78068-218-2 |
| Barcode: |
9781780682181 |
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!