Books > Social sciences > Sociology, social studies > Social issues > Ethical issues & debates > Pornography & obscenity
|
Not currently available
Defending Pornography - Free Speech, Sex, and the Fight for Women's Rights (Paperback, New Ed)
Loot Price: R596
Discovery Miles 5 960
You Save: R85
(12%)
|
|
Defending Pornography - Free Speech, Sex, and the Fight for Women's Rights (Paperback, New Ed)
(sign in to rate)
List price R681
Loot Price R596
Discovery Miles 5 960
You Save R85 (12%)
Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.
|
The definitive feminist critique of MacKinnon/Dworkin
anti-pornography laws, by ACLU president and legal scholar Strossen
(Law/New York Univ.). Since the late 1970s, feminist discourse has
been dominated by the anti-pornography voices of law professor
Catharine MacKinnon, writer Andrea Dworkin, and their followers,
whom the author dubs "MacDworkinites." MacDworkinites hold that
pornography should be suppressed because it causes (and is itself a
form of) violence against women. These feminists have forged what
Strossen calls "frighteningly effective alliances" with religious
fundamentalists staunchly opposed to women's rights. This alliance
has won victories on many fronts: in Canada, where obscenity laws
have been interpreted as embodying MacDworkinite standards for
pornography (e.g., whether the work of art "dehumanizes" women); on
campuses, where draconian speech codes cover "sexually suggestive
looks." Dworkin and MacKinnon are great communicators, but Strossen
proves their match. Her response to them is tough, clear, and
pithy. She offers a host of reasons why MacDworkinite measures
actually imperil civil liberties: The laws are a "hopelessly vague"
curtailment of free speech; they will be enforced unevenly by
traditionalist governments against disfavored groups such as
feminists, gays, and lesbians; they perpetuate the stereotype of
women as victims requiring protection from the patriarchy; they
distract us from concrete discriminatory conduct. Strossen also
explores the MacDworkinite ambivalence toward sex in general: On
the one hand, both MacKinnon and Dworkin portray sexual conduct as
inherently degrading to women - as rape; on the other hand, both
express themselves in hot-and-heavy language that the author
gleefully quotes. Sometimes Strossen's attacks seem personal and
petty, as when she chides MacKinnon for avoiding debate and mocks
Dworkin for having two of her own books seized at the Canadian
border under anti-pornography statutes. But her counter-argument is
firmly rooted in both the First Amendment and the real world. An
important book that will rally free-speech feminists and civil
libertarians of all stripes. (Kirkus Reviews)
A women's rights-centered rationale for defending pornography
Traditional explanations of why pornography must be defended from
would-be censors have concentrated on censorship's adverse impacts
on free speech and sexual autonomy. In contrast, Nadine Strossen
focuses on the women's rights-centered rationale for defending
pornography. Reissued with a new foreword and introduction by the
author.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
You might also like..
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.