In the last decade a new tool has been developed in the global
war against official corruption through the introduction of the
offense of "illicit enrichment" in almost every multilateral
anti-corruption convention. Illicit enrichment is defined in these
conventions to include a reverse burden clause which triggers an
automatic presumption that any public official found in "possession
of inexplicable wealth" must have acquired it illicitly. However,
the reversal of the burden of proof clauses raises an important
human rights issue because they conflict with the accused
individual 's right to be presumed innocent. Unfortunately, the
recent spate of international legislation against official
corruption provides no clear guidelines on how to proceed in
balancing the right of the accused to be presumed innocent against
the competing right of society to trace and recapture illicitly
acquired national wealth.
Combating Economic Crimes therefore sets out to address what has
been left unanswered by these multilateral conventions, to wit, the
level of burden of proof that should be placed on a public official
who is accused of illicitly enriching himself from the resources of
the State, balanced against the protection of legitimate community
interests and expectations for a corruption-free society. The book
explores the doctrinal foundations of the right to a presumption of
innocence and reviews the basic due process protections afforded to
all accused persons in criminal trials by treaty, customary
international law, and municipal law. The book then goes on to
propose a framework for balancing and situationalizing competing
human rights and public interests in situations involving possible
official corruption.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!