In the current legal climate where “everyone is an
originalist,” conventional wisdom suggests that judges merely
find law, rather than make it. Orthodox common-law jurisprudence
makes fidelity to the past the central goal and criterion. By
contrast, the alternative approach, “reading the law
forward”—what some call judicial pragmatism or
consequentialism—is viewed as heretical. Rather than mount a
theoretical defense of a forward-thinking jurisprudence, legal
historian Peter Charles Hoffer offers an empirical study of how
this approach to constitutional interpretation actually leads to
better law. Reading Law Forward looks at seven judges who exemplify
this alternative jurisprudence: John Marshall, Joseph Story, Lemuel
Shaw, Louis D. Brandeis, Benjamin Cardozo, William O. Douglas, and
Stephen G. Breyer.“In the hands of America’s leading judges, a
jurisprudence of reading law forward enabled courts to respond to
the challenges of changing conditions. It kept law fresh. It
promoted and still promotes the growth of a democratic society,”
Hoffer convincingly argues.
General
| Imprint: |
University Press of Kansas
|
| Country of origin: |
United States |
| Release date: |
July 2023 |
| Authors: |
Peter Charles Hoffer
|
| Dimensions: |
229 x 152mm (L x W) |
| Pages: |
240 |
| ISBN-13: |
978-0-7006-3508-5 |
| Categories: |
Books
Promotions
|
| LSN: |
0-7006-3508-4 |
| Barcode: |
9780700635085 |
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!