0
Your cart

Your cart is empty

Books > Law > Laws of other jurisdictions & general law > Constitutional & administrative law > Citizenship & nationality law > Immigration law

Buy Now

Let Me Be a Refugee - Administrative Justice and the Politics of Asylum in the United States, Canada, and Australia (Paperback) Loot Price: R1,276
Discovery Miles 12 760
Let Me Be a Refugee - Administrative Justice and the Politics of Asylum in the United States, Canada, and Australia...

Let Me Be a Refugee - Administrative Justice and the Politics of Asylum in the United States, Canada, and Australia (Paperback)

Rebecca Hamlin

 (sign in to rate)
Loot Price R1,276 Discovery Miles 12 760 | Repayment Terms: R120 pm x 12*

Bookmark and Share

Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days

Why do decision-makers in similar liberal democracies interpret the same legal definition in very different ways? International law provides states with a common definition of a 'refugee' as well as guidelines outlining how asylum claims should be decided. Yet, the processes by which countries determine who should be granted refugee status look strikingly different, even across nations with many political, cultural, geographical, and institutional commonalities. This book compares the refugee status determination (RSD) regimes of three popular asylum seeker destinations - the United States, Canada, and Australia. Despite similarly high levels of political resistance to accepting asylum seekers across these three states, once asylum seekers cross their borders, they access three very different systems. These differences are significant both in terms of asylum seekers' experience of the process and in terms of their likelihood of being found to be a refugee.
The book moves beyond the claim by some scholars that asylum seeker destinations are uniformly becoming more exclusionary, and the contrary assertions of other scholars that the same destinations are converging on a new inclusive internationalism leading to the decline of state sovereignty. Instead, Hamlin finds these states to be running on three distinct trajectories, none of which are totally restrictive or expansive. Based on a multi-method analysis of all three countries, including a year of fieldwork with in-depth interviews of policy-makers and asylum-seeker advocates, observations of refugee status determination hearings, and a large-scale case analysis, Hamlin finds that cross-national differences have less to do with political debates over admission and border control policy than with the level of insulation the administrative decision-making agency enjoys from either political interference or judicial review. Administrative justice is conceptualized and organized differently in every state, and so states vary in how they draw the line between refugee and non-refugee.

General

Imprint: Oxford UniversityPress
Country of origin: United States
Release date: October 2014
First published: September 2014
Authors: Rebecca Hamlin (Assistant Professor of Political Science)
Dimensions: 234 x 162 x 16mm (L x W x T)
Format: Paperback
Pages: 248
ISBN-13: 978-0-19-937331-4
Categories: Books > Social sciences > Sociology, social studies > Social issues > Refugees & political asylum
Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > International relations > General
Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Political control & freedoms > Human rights > General
Books > Law > Laws of other jurisdictions & general law > Constitutional & administrative law > Citizenship & nationality law > Immigration law
LSN: 0-19-937331-0
Barcode: 9780199373314

Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate? Let us know about it.

Does this product have an incorrect or missing image? Send us a new image.

Is this product missing categories? Add more categories.

Review This Product

No reviews yet - be the first to create one!

Partners