|
Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Political structure & processes > Elections & referenda
|
Buy Now
Electing Justice - Fixing the Supreme Court Nomination Process (Hardcover)
Loot Price: R1,419
Discovery Miles 14 190
|
|
|
Electing Justice - Fixing the Supreme Court Nomination Process (Hardcover)
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
The nomination and confirmation of Supreme Court justices has, in
recent years, become a battleground like no other. Bruising Senate
confirmation hearings for failed nominee Robert Bork and successful
nominee Clarence Thomas left the reputation of all branches of
government in disarray and the participants-and the
nation-exhausted. The Senate's Constitutional prerogative to
provide advice and consent to the President's nominations to the
highest court in the land has given rise to political grandstanding
and ideological battles. Less well known is how other
players-interest groups, the news media, and, through their
involvement, the general public-also affect the conduct and outcome
of the Supreme Court nomination process. Electing Justice reveals
how from the late 1960s on, the role of these other players grew in
intensity to the point that the nomination process would be
unrecognizable to its original devisers, the Framers of the
Constitution. Over the past quarter century, live television
coverage of Senate hearings, "murder boards" in preparation for
those hearings, a flood of press releases, television and radio
advertisements, and public opinion polls all characterize
nominations. Unlike earlier, more elite-governed processes, the
involvement of outside groups has become highly public and their
effect on the outcome of some nominations is now widely accepted.
How should we respond to this informal democratization of the
selection process? The genie, Davis contends, cannot be put back
into the bottle and we cannot return to a non-political,
elite-driven ideal. Davis concludes with several controversial
recommendations that preserve the public role while avoiding the
excesses of past controversial nominations. By embracing the
public's new role in the examination of nominees we can ensure a
democratic process and secure an independent and accountable
judicial branch.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.