0
Your cart

Your cart is empty

Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Political structure & processes > Elections & referenda

Buy Now

Electing Justice - Fixing the Supreme Court Nomination Process (Hardcover) Loot Price: R1,419
Discovery Miles 14 190
Electing Justice - Fixing the Supreme Court Nomination Process (Hardcover): Richard Davis

Electing Justice - Fixing the Supreme Court Nomination Process (Hardcover)

Richard Davis

 (sign in to rate)
Loot Price R1,419 Discovery Miles 14 190 | Repayment Terms: R133 pm x 12*

Bookmark and Share

Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days

The nomination and confirmation of Supreme Court justices has, in recent years, become a battleground like no other. Bruising Senate confirmation hearings for failed nominee Robert Bork and successful nominee Clarence Thomas left the reputation of all branches of government in disarray and the participants-and the nation-exhausted. The Senate's Constitutional prerogative to provide advice and consent to the President's nominations to the highest court in the land has given rise to political grandstanding and ideological battles. Less well known is how other players-interest groups, the news media, and, through their involvement, the general public-also affect the conduct and outcome of the Supreme Court nomination process. Electing Justice reveals how from the late 1960s on, the role of these other players grew in intensity to the point that the nomination process would be unrecognizable to its original devisers, the Framers of the Constitution. Over the past quarter century, live television coverage of Senate hearings, "murder boards" in preparation for those hearings, a flood of press releases, television and radio advertisements, and public opinion polls all characterize nominations. Unlike earlier, more elite-governed processes, the involvement of outside groups has become highly public and their effect on the outcome of some nominations is now widely accepted. How should we respond to this informal democratization of the selection process? The genie, Davis contends, cannot be put back into the bottle and we cannot return to a non-political, elite-driven ideal. Davis concludes with several controversial recommendations that preserve the public role while avoiding the excesses of past controversial nominations. By embracing the public's new role in the examination of nominees we can ensure a democratic process and secure an independent and accountable judicial branch.

General

Imprint: Oxford UniversityPress
Country of origin: United States
Release date: April 2005
First published: March 2005
Authors: Richard Davis (Professor of Political Science)
Dimensions: 242 x 164 x 19mm (L x W x T)
Format: Hardcover
Pages: 220
ISBN-13: 978-0-19-518109-8
Categories: Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Political structure & processes > Elections & referenda
Books > Law > Laws of other jurisdictions & general law > Courts & procedure > General
Promotions
LSN: 0-19-518109-3
Barcode: 9780195181098

Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate? Let us know about it.

Does this product have an incorrect or missing image? Send us a new image.

Is this product missing categories? Add more categories.

Review This Product

No reviews yet - be the first to create one!

Partners