Lawyers, judges, and scholars have long debated whether
incentives in tort, contract, and restitution law effectively
promote the welfare of society. If these incentives were ideal,
tort law would reduce the cost and frequency of accidents, contract
law would lubricate transactions, and restitution law would
encourage people to benefit others. Unfortunately, the incentives
in these laws lead to too many injuries, too little contractual
cooperation, and too few unrequested benefits. "Getting Incentives
Right" explains how law might better serve the social good.
In tort law, Robert Cooter and Ariel Porat propose that all
foreseeable risks should be included when setting standards of care
and awarding damages. Failure to do so causes accidents that better
legal incentives would avoid. In contract law, they show that
making a promise often causes the person who receives it to change
behavior and undermine the cooperation between the parties. They
recommend several solutions, including a novel contract called
"anti-insurance." In restitution law, people who convey unrequested
benefits to others are seldom entitled to compensation. Restitution
law should compensate them more than it currently does, so that
they will provide more unrequested benefits. In these three areas
of law, "Getting Incentives Right" demonstrates that better law can
promote the well-being of people by providing better incentives for
the private regulation of conduct.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!