This provocative exploration of the issues surrounding free
speech protection calls into question some important assumptions
underlying much of contemporary free speech case law. The author
considers the free speech issues associated with matters as diverse
as the use of racial epithets, flag burning, obscenity, and speech
by public school students, public school teachers, and public
employees in general. He argues persuasively that free speech law
has become unnecessarily complex and that free speech protection
has been extended well beyond the bounds suggested by the various
reasons for protecting speech in the first place. These
developments, Professor Wright contends, risk an eventual weakening
of the public commitment to free speech as a fundamental value.
In a series of chapters--some broadly theoretical in character,
others focused on concrete free speech cases--Wright develops his
argument that the courts' tendency to gradually expand the scope of
protection afforded by the free speech clause dilutes the essential
seriousness of the clause and will eventually tend to erode public
support for freedom of speech as a fundamental principal. On a more
abstract level, Wright demonstrates that, increasingly, the case
law of freedom of speech is grounded only in some form of
relativist or subjectivist thought. The long-term risk, Wright
suggests, is that our adoption of freedom of speech may come to be
seen as an arbitrary preference without morally binding character
in any traditional sense. Writing for students of constitutional
law as well as practicing attorneys involved in free speech cases,
this volume is an important counterweight to arguments in support
of continual expansion of free speech protection.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!