Books > Law > Laws of other jurisdictions & general law > Constitutional & administrative law
|
Buy Now
Judging Statutes (Hardcover)
Loot Price: R990
Discovery Miles 9 900
|
|
Judging Statutes (Hardcover)
Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days
|
Over the last twenty-five years, there has been a spirited debate
in the courts, Congress, and in the academy about how to interpret
federal statutes, the laws of Congress. Federal judges spend a
considerable amount of time trying to understand Congress's
meaning. Just as Congress produces laws, so courts are called on to
interpret them. When the language of the statute is unambiguous,
then, the job of the judge is generally straightforward. But
when-as often happens-the statute is ambiguous, the interpretative
task is not obvious. How a judge interprets statutes - sticking
only to the text when the language is ambiguous, or going beyond
the text to legislative materials - is of fundamental importance.
For the methodology of interpretation can affect the outcome and
thus whether the law has been construed consistently with
Congress's meaning. Justice Scalia has fueled the debate, arguing
that courts should look to the text of the statute and to virtually
nothing else. In Judging Statutes, Chief Judge Robert A. Katzmann
of the U.S Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, respectfully
disagrees. Drawing upon his interdisciplinary background in law and
political science, he argues that our constitutional system charges
Congress with enacting laws; so, how Congress makes its purposes
known, through text and reliable accompanying materials should be
respected. Judge Katzmann contends that there has been scant
consideration given to what is critical as courts interpret
statutes - an appreciation of how Congress actually functions and
signals its meaning, and what Congress expects of those
interpreting its laws. Judging Statutes explores how Congress
works; how agencies construe legislation; and examines two
interpretative approaches, purposivsm and textualism. The author
discusses cases in which he was the writing judge and which the
Supreme Court reviewed, and concludes with some suggestions to
promote understanding between courts and Congress.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
You might also like..
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.