0
Your cart

Your cart is empty

Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Western philosophy > Modern Western philosophy, c 1600 to the present > Western philosophy, from c 1900 - > Analytical & linguistic philosophy

Buy Now

Necessity Lost - Modality and Logic in Early Analytic Philosophy, Volume 1 (Hardcover) Loot Price: R2,393
Discovery Miles 23 930
Necessity Lost - Modality and Logic in Early Analytic Philosophy, Volume 1 (Hardcover): Sanford Shieh

Necessity Lost - Modality and Logic in Early Analytic Philosophy, Volume 1 (Hardcover)

Sanford Shieh

 (sign in to rate)
Loot Price R2,393 Discovery Miles 23 930 | Repayment Terms: R224 pm x 12*

Bookmark and Share

Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days

A long tradition, going back to Aristotle, conceives of logic in terms of necessity and possibility: a deductive argument is correct if it is not possible for the conclusion to be false when the premises are true. A relatively unknown feature of the analytic tradition in philosophy is that, at its very inception, this venerable conception of the relation between logic and necessity and possibility - the concepts of modality - was put into question. The founders of analytic philosophy, Gottlob Frege and Bertrand Russell, held that these concepts are empty: there are no genuine distinctions among the necessary, the possible, and the actual. In this book, the first of two volumes, Sanford Shieh investigates the grounds of this position and its consequences for Frege's and Russell's conceptions of logic. The grounds lie in doctrines on truth, thought, and knowledge, as well as on the relation between mind and reality, that are central to the philosophies of Frege and Russell, and are of enduring philosophical interest. The upshot of this opposition to modality is that logic is fundamental, and, to be coherent, modal concepts would have to be reconstructed in logical terms. This rejection of modality in early analytic philosophy remains of contemporary significance, though the coherence of modal concepts is rarely questioned nowadays because it is generally assumed that suspicion of modality derives from logical positivism, which has not survived philosophical scrutiny. The anti-modal arguments of Frege and Russell, however, have nothing to do with positivism and remain a challenge to the contemporary acceptance of modal notions.

General

Imprint: Oxford UniversityPress
Country of origin: United Kingdom
Release date: April 2019
Authors: Sanford Shieh (Associate Professor)
Dimensions: 236 x 164 x 30mm (L x W x T)
Format: Hardcover
Pages: 466
ISBN-13: 978-0-19-922864-5
Categories: Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy > Epistemology, theory of knowledge
Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy > Logic
Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Western philosophy > Modern Western philosophy, c 1600 to the present > Western philosophy, from c 1900 - > Analytical & linguistic philosophy
Books > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy > Epistemology, theory of knowledge
Books > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy > Logic
Books > Philosophy > Western philosophy > Modern Western philosophy, c 1600 to the present > Western philosophy, from c 1900 - > Analytical & linguistic philosophy
LSN: 0-19-922864-7
Barcode: 9780199228645

Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate? Let us know about it.

Does this product have an incorrect or missing image? Send us a new image.

Is this product missing categories? Add more categories.

Review This Product

No reviews yet - be the first to create one!

Partners