Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Political structure & processes
|
Buy Now
Challenging the State: Devolution and the Battle for Partisan Credibility - A Comparison of Belgium, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom (Hardcover, New)
Loot Price: R2,807
Discovery Miles 28 070
You Save: R675
(19%)
|
|
Challenging the State: Devolution and the Battle for Partisan Credibility - A Comparison of Belgium, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom (Hardcover, New)
Series: Comparative Politics
Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days
|
How do state parties react to the challenge of peripheral parties
demanding political power to be devolved to their culturally
distinct territories? Is devolution the best response to these
demands? Why do national governments implement devolution given the
high risk that devolution will encourage peripheral parties to
demand ever more devolved powers? The aim of this book is to answer
these questions through a comparative analysis of devolution in
four European countries: Belgium, Italy, Spain, and the United
Kingdom. The author argues that electoral competition between state
and peripheral parties pushes some state parties to prefer
devolution at some particular point in time. Devolution is an
electoral strategy adopted in order to make it more difficult in
the long term for peripheral parties to increase their electoral
support by claiming the monopoly of representation of the
peripheral territory and the people in it. The strategy of
devolution is preferred over short-term tactics of convergence
towards the peripheral programmatic agenda because the
pro-periphery tactics of state parties in unitary centralised
states are not credible in the eyes of voters. The price that state
parties pay for making their electoral tactics credible is the
'entrenchment' of the devolution programmatic agenda in the
electoral arena. The final implication of this argument is that in
democratic systems devolution is not a decision to protect the
state from the secessionist threat. It is, instead, a decision by
state parties to protect their needed electoral majorities.
Comparative Politics is a series for students, teachers, and
researchers of political science that deals with contemporary
government and politics. Global in scope, books in the series are
characterised by a stress on comparative analysis and strong
methodological rigour. The series is published in association with
the European Consortium for Political Research. For more
information visit: www.ecprnet.eu. The Comparative Politics series
is edited by Professor David M. Farrell, School of Politics and
International Relations, University College Dublin, Kenneth Carty,
Professor of Political Science, University of British Columbia, and
Professor Dirk Berg-Schlosser, Institute of Political Science,
Philipps University, Marburg.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
You might also like..
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.