This book examines recent attempts at reform within the United
Nations in the wake of the institutional crisis provoked by the
invasion of Iraq. It contends that efforts at reform have foundered
owing to fundamental and bitter political disagreements between the
nations of the global North and South.
Following profound discord in the Security Council in the lead
up to the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003, this book considers the
ambitious programme of reform instigated by then serving UN
Secretary-General Kofi Annan. The author of this highly topical
work, Spencer Zifcak, subjects six of Annan s principal proposals
for reform to scrutiny: the reform of the Security Council, the
General Assembly, and the Human Rights Council, and suggested
alterations to international law with respect to the use of force
in international affairs, the responsibility to protect, and UN
strategies to counter global terrorism. On the basis of these
detailed case-studies, the book demonstrates why so few proposals
for reform were eventually adopted. It argues that the principal
reason for this failure was that nations of the North and South
could not agree as to the merits of the reforms proposed, exposing
the sharply differing visions held by member states for a future
and improved United Nations.
Founded upon extensive interviews with diplomats at the United
Nations, the book provides a rare insider account of UN politics
and practice. It will be of vital interest to students, scholars
and practitioners of International Relations, International Law,
and International Institutions.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!