The acceptance of human rights and minority rights, the
increasing role of international financial institutions, and
globalization have led many observers to question the continued
viability of the sovereign state. Here a leading expert challenges
this conclusion. Stephen Krasner contends that states have never
been as sovereign as some have supposed. Throughout history, rulers
have been motivated by a desire to stay in power, not by some
abstract adherence to international principles. Organized
hypocrisy--the presence of longstanding norms that are frequently
violated--has been an enduring attribute of international
relations
Political leaders have usually but not always honored
international legal sovereignty, the principle that international
recognition should be accorded only to juridically independent
sovereign states, while treating Westphalian sovereignty, the
principle that states have the right to exclude external authority
from their own territory, in a much more provisional way. In some
instances violations of the principles of sovereignty have been
coercive, as in the imposition of minority rights on newly created
states after the First World War or the successor states of
Yugoslavia after 1990; at other times cooperative, as in the
European Human Rights regime or conditionality agreements with the
International Monetary Fund.
The author looks at various issues areas to make his argument:
minority rights, human rights, sovereign lending, and state
creation in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Differences in
national power and interests, he concludes, not international
norms, continue to be the most powerful explanation for the
behavior of states.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!