Caliendo examines the results of a comprehensive study of how
students learn about American Government. The working premise is
that while many political attitudes formed during adolescent
socialization are open to change throughout one's life, latent
attitudes that are not salient and, thus, are not challenged with
new information provided by media or other communications are more
likely to persist into adulthood. He focuses on diffuse support for
the United States Supreme Court and argues that how students are
taught about the Court in high school is likely to have a
particularly lasting effect due to the Court's relative
invisibility.
Drawing from interviews with teachers, analysis of Government
textbooks, and student surveys, the findings suggest that teachers
make a difference in how students perceive parts of the political
system (particularly the Supreme Court). This is particularly
relevant for more abstract parts of the system since those types of
attitudes are unlikely to be challenged through the mass media
throughout one's life. Normative discussion of the role of schools
in educating for democracy suggests that there is a problem of
priority as well as approach. Putting social science on the back
burner may have important ramifications, as students are not asked
to think critically about the American political system and their
role within it. Of particular interest to scholars, researchers,
and policy makers involved with social science education and
political socialization.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!